IMPARCIALIDADE E NEUTRALIDADE: DISTINÇÃO DOGMATICAMENTE RELEVANTE?

the text analyzes the distinction between impartiality and neutrality employed for functional purposes, that is, to take the judge's absence of subjective neutrality as a basis to justify the attribution of functional and decision-making competencies. It describes the arguments that defend this split, submits them to criticism and defends the ban of the thesis, denying its legal-dogmatic value.