La <i>Judicial Review</i> en la obra de Justo Arosemena

The text examines Justo Arosemena’s contribution to the nineteenth-century Latin American debate on constitutional review. It explores the tension in his thought between skepticism toward New Granada’s Supreme Court and his critical engagement with U.S.-style judicial review, particularly regarding the limits imposed by the case-or-controversy rule and political-question doctrine. Arosemena advocates broader standing and a centralized abstract action against unconstitutional laws, anticipating mixed models of constitutional review.